Posts Tagged ‘Batman’

Dark Knight PosterWhat makes Christopher Nolans’ film The Black Knight so compelling? Critics agree: Nolan strikes a deep chord with his portrayal of the rivalrous bond between the Batman and his arch nemesis, the Joker.  To watch the film, is to be drawn into the inner vortex of their mutually obsessive relationship.

The Batman and the JokerThe Joker, played by Heath Ledger,  refuses, when he has the chance, to kill his rival.  The conflict between the Batman and the Joker, which drive’s the movie’s plot, is by no means a cliche battle between good guy and bad guy, in which both sides seek to annihilate the other. The Joker needs the Batman, he’s fascinated by him, orchestrating ways to get close to the Batman, and insert himself into his life. Remember the Joker’s pivotal line, which on its own, won Heath Ledger the Oscar:

You complete me. [View on YouTube]

The-Dark-Knight-Rises-Trailer-fan-madeThis makes total sense in light of Mimetic Theory, what René Girard terms the Model-Obstacle Relationship: we are fascinated by our rivals, whose power to command our attention seems to derive from some autonomous inner source, when in fact it’s our desire which gives them that irresistible quality. This means that the Batman, though he won’t openly disclose it, may be just as dependent on the Joker for his self-concept and sense of being.

The model-obstacle is someone or something over whom the subject cannot win, or in some cases it would be accurate to say that the subject will not allow himself to defeat the model-obstacle, for to achieve that would be to lose the model. All sorts of self-defeating behavior, including addictions (so well described in Dostoyevsky’s writings), stem from this predicament. From the standpoint of the mimetic theory, it can only be understood in terms of the mimetic, interdividual character of human existence. The person in this predicament could be described as stumbling over or being blocked by the skandalon (Greek). (James G. Williams, The Girard Reader, 291)

Joker Movie PosterThe Batman, mirroring the fascination of his rival, also refuses, when given the chance, to kill his rival. Why is that? [View on YouTube] Does the Batman need the Joker too, in a kind reciprocity? Or was he acting out of compassion? We may never know.

Either way, the result is the same — rather than bring the conflict to it’s usual conclusion, in The Dark Knight the model-obstacle relationship intensifies. At movie’s climax, when the Batman finally has the Joker in his grip, rather than turn the Joker over to the authorities (his usual MO) the Batman lets the Joker go!

the batman and the joker mirror imageDoes this lead the Joker to repent or have a change of heart? The usual cliche movie plot? Not a chance! The Batman’s incredible self-control only makes him more attractive to his rival. But again, the Batman’s autonomous inner source is an illusion, fueled from the start by the Joker’s fascination. As their model-obstacle relationship intensifies on both sides, and each is transfigured by the desire of the other, it’s impossible to say who created who. – Sue Wright


Who is that masked man?

Posted: October 17, 2014 in Batman
Tags: , , , ,

Why is The Batman such an ambiguous figure? Unlike Superman or Captain America, the Batman, dark and brooding, casts a frightening silhouette against the night sky.

The very first lines of the very first issue released in 1939 describe the Batman as “a mysterious adventurous figure fighting for righteousness and apprehending the wrongdoer, in his lone battle against the evil forces of society… his identity remains unknown.

Like most superheroes, the Batman keeps his identity hidden behind a mask.  But why doesn’t he  adopt a more wholesome appearance? Make it clear that he’s one of the good guys?  Instead the Batman chooses to imitate the very criminals he’s out to capture. It’s no surprise then, that throughout the comic’s history, the people of Gotham turn on their protector, time and again. Must the Batman be so dark and mysterious? 

In the sixth issue, DC #33, we get his back story:  The boy Bruce Wayne, in the course of an armed robbery, witnessed his parents’ murders close hand. Kneeling at the side of his bed, he swore to avenge their deaths by dedicating the rest of his life to warring on all such criminals.

At first glance, Wayne appears to be a run of the mill vigilante. Motivated by revenge, he takes the law into his own hands, imposing justice in a society plagued by crime and corruption. Hmm… is that legal?

The fact is, the advent of the Batman Comic coincides with a specific moment in American history. In the first decades of the 20th century, an unmitigated rise in organized crime, political corruption, bank robberies and lawlessness, left honest officials and the American public feeling helpless and demoralized. I suggest you Google “Al Capone,” “Bonnie and Clyde,” “Baby Face Nelso, and “John Dillinger” — you’ll see what I mean — why comics from the 1930’s glorified vigilantes, self-appointed crime fighters, like the Batman, who took matters in to their own hands.

But unlike the typical vigilante, Batman doesn’t inflict his own punishment or exact personal revenge upon the criminals he apprehends. He almost always turns the criminals over to the police. But again, given his cooperation with the justice system, I can’t help but question his choice of disguise; it’s a bit over the top. Vigilantes tend to hide their identities to avoid being caught. Why does Bruce Wayne choose to imitate a bat: with a cape that extends like bat wings, with gloves are clenched like bat claws, wearing mask resembling a bat’s head with pointy ears and slit eyes. Wouldn’t a simple Lone Ranger mask suffice? Why the bat costume?  I suspect Batman’s disguise serves another purpose altogether, that his role is far more dark and mysterious than that of any vigilante.   

René Girard‘s description of the shaman’s use of animal masks for ceremonial rituals casts a provocative light on Batman’s ambiguous role and appearance:

[Animal] Masks stand at that equivocal frontier between the human and the ‘divine,’ between a differentiated order in the process of disintegration and its final undifferentiated state – the point where all differences, all monstrosities are concentrated, and from which a new order will emerge…( Violence and the Sacred, 168)

That is, Batman stands, a lonely silhouette, on the brink between a break down of law and order and it’s descent into complete lawlessness. The shaman imitates the animals and the monstrosities breaking down the community from within. On some imaginative level he’s able to harness and redirect these “evil forces” into rituals which restore order.  Like the shaman, Bruce Wayne enshrouds himself in the same stealth and cunning the crooks and robbers use to prey on their victims at night. Masked as a bat, an ambiguous creature which is neither human nor divine, Batman is the only figure able to master these lawless animals and round them up for prosecution, he is the only one to command order out of chaos.

But there’s more:  The first issue of Batman (DC #27) appeared in May 1939, on the eve of World War II, coinciding with the birth of the superhero genre as a whole.  Preoccupied with internal tensions, the US did not enter the war until two years later. It took time to shift her internal energies, and especially the public’s attention, outward. In more ways than one, comics played a significant part in this, beyond just recruiting America’s youth for the war effort – once America mobilized all her resources for war it didn’t take long for a new order to emerge: within a decade the US became a world super power. The monsters at home which had plagued the population for decades were finally subdued as our internal lawlessness was redirected towards foreign enemies: Germany and Japan and later the Soviet Union. On some imaginative level Batman stands at the nexus of this process,  rounding up the internal forces threatening the community from within and redirecting them toward a common enemy.   But again, Batman is not the one to carry justice to its socially sanctioned ends, that’s left to the unambiguous heroes of the new order: Superman and Captain America.

Once the “evil forces” are redirected and order’s restored, Girard warns, the “masks disappear,” “the monsters once again assume human form.” The question then becomes: what happens to the Batman’s role when the shaman’s mask is no longer needed?  – Sue Wright